Skip to main content

Professional Identity and Field Caution

This week I appreciated the tying of the ongoing theme of these articles regarding the field and how it is taught and what it produces to professional identity development. Tracey in Chapter 12 discussed not only how an ID can design from a place of self integration as a valid and effective method of creating designed solutions to educational needs, but also how that same approach can work to help students learning and training to become IDs find and center their ID professional identity foundation. She uses readings from Nelson and Stolterman, 2003 to back her up saying "Those who view design from this lens [the lens outlined in the first paragraph p.93 as counterpoint to model or process learning], and who study how it occurs in practice, present design not as a smooth systematic process but instead as that designer's values, belief structures, prior experiences, knowledge and skills, and approach to design affect the final outcome" and later adds "Developing a professional identity that is aligned with design thinking will exert an ongoing influence on designers' professional actions, values, beliefs, decisions, and commitments." Together I think these quotes sum up my feelings on how I think she makes a compelling case for how these are iterative processes that fit well together to the benefit of the individual and the field.

However, I also appreciated very much that Hokanson's pushback with what he termed 'Instructional Science' (p. 99). I felt it gave Tracey room to clarify that her call for a sustained shift in the focus being an evolution from the ways of process alone, not a replacement. I do think she swings a little idealistic in the idea that approaching it that way will not eventually lead to more theories, more operationalizing attempts, and more future battles for sustained holism fighting that shift back to what might be called a 'newer more human-centered ADDIE!' that can come with people over-eager to create operationalized processes. I think it's important to be realistic about that possibility, so that she could address it in her response. I am disappointed she did not grapple with that idea further. Especially since in the past we have had chapters in which the authors did have conversations about projected inevitabilities and those led to cautions about intention and the ways that building self-checks in the field are necessary. I am not sure any method or approach - no matter how human centered - can escape the need for built-in methods of self-reflection, review of 'the times', and guidelines for catching changing needs of human learners so that they are not missed by the field until the field is beholden to responding to the world as it is from a place of surviving rather than thriving.

What I found in the Merrill and Tracey discussion was that it felt a bit beyond my sense of the field. In summary it seemed to me that Merrill was insisting that undergraduate programs needed to take on the task of training up IDs for the field and that IDs should pursue Master's degrees for the sake of becoming researchers and theorists. I can appreciate that this method of conducting the long-term establishment of a field seems like a well-known approach. However, it felt rather antithetical in nature to everything else we'd been reading. If undergraduates are the ones primarily being trained to be IDs, then the undergraduate programs would need to be fundamentally different than most are right now to be effective. The strengths identified in ID education is that they are working in lab or field situations from the get-go, but this would not be possible in the typical undergrad experience, as one example. Undergraduates are still in high flux about their identity, which would make professional identity development of a holistic nature and based on designer strengths more difficult for another. I also couldn't help but feel like ultimately the two authors were reinforcing each other rather than it being the two of them challenging each others ideas. Their thrill seemed to be in IDs prepared to launch into corporate situations and take the world by storm. It all felt a bit out of touch with what we'd been reading previously, I thought - but that is why I preface the reflection on this chapter with the piece about it feeling outside my sense of the field. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Screen Capture and Record Showcase

The video below is meant as a basic tour of the gradebook in Elearning for new TAs or TAs who need a review. It's intent is to supplement an larger Elearning course meant to facilitate TA's as a reference and guide for how to grade a course, the different tools they have access to, and when to seek outside help. The video takes TAs through the basic layout of the gradebook, and toggles between the two crucial screens in gradebook management. It mentions some of the symbols used in Elearning to make grading more convenient, and refers TAs to the screenshot embedded on this page. The screenshot below was developed with the intent to supplement the above demo tour through the gradebook in Elearning. It illustrates symbols that are referenced in the demo and details further how they can be of use to the TA grading tasks. Assignment:  For your Screencast video: Come up with a fairly basic (I’ll let you judge) computer-based task that you would want to demonstrate as part of a less...

Transcending Content

In my comment last week I was trying to suss out what the 'stakes' of instructional design were, if the argument is that design is a need and not a privilege, and also that design is a need. In this weeks reading I appreciated that it more clearly focused on what those stakes could be through the lens of what instructional design could bring to the table in terms of educational design.   Wilson introduces the term 'principled resistance' as a response to "certain ideas that are seen as negatively impacting the profession" (p 27). And while I think the way he qualifies heavily by using the 'certain' and the 'seem' padding in his statement (illustrating what he later cops being what he terms a 'limited radical') I appreciated his use of the term for the way it makes space and acknowledges that radicalism is not synonymous with a lack of intention or that it is simply an act of unstructured rebellion. I also appreciated Martin's cautio...

In Which Corporate Optimization Becomes Human Brain Innovation and the Patriarchy Lives On

 In the opening paragraph of chapter 15 Marker says the majority of businesses - who have been allowed to become the dominant institutions of our time - are so focused on profit that it "contributes to adverse social and environmental outcomes that outstrip our biological, psychological, and even spiritual abilities." (Marker, 117) Initially I read this as Marker criticizing the system that vaunts business in this way, the one he calls out for "making profit the ultimate measure of success." However, upon closer read it feels unsettlingly like rather than having an interest in changing the system, Marker is making a case for the way neurobiology can improve the methods of HPI to operationalize human behavior to match the tasks of profit better and also wouldn't it be nice if along the way businesses took on a more moral - here defined as taking into their method of profit methods of diversifying the industry in ways that allow business at large to continue into ...