Skip to main content

EXPECTATIONS: a new course carried on from the old.


Instructor: Dr. Brian Horvitz

The Theory and Practice of Online Learning, 2nd Edition, Anderson & Elloumi. Free
Ebook found at
 
Adding Some TEC-VARIETY: 100+ Activities for Motivating and Retaining Online
Learners, Free PDF download found at



Discussion Expectations:

1 page (approx: 500 words) by Thursdays, substantive responses to 2 peers by Sundays

Regarding your discussion postings, Grice's (1975) principle and maxims of conversation are also useful to keep in mind:

The principle of co-operation: Try to make your contribution one that supports the goal and purpose of the ongoing conversation.

1. Maxim of quantity: Make your contribution as informative as is required, but give no more information than is required. (Sometimes overly long posts make it harder to have conversational dialogue.)

2. Maxim of quality: Try to make your contribution one that is true. Do not say anything that you believe is false or lacks adequate evidence.

3. Maxim of relevance: Make your contribution relevant to the aims of the ongoing conversation. (Focus on the objectives and goals of that week's readings.)

4. Maxim of manner: Be clear. Try to avoid obscurity, ambiguity, wordiness. (Think of our discussions as conversations supported by evidence, but not as exercises in academic writing.)

From Grice, H. 1975. 'Logic and conversation'. In Speech Acts, edited by P. Cole, & Morgan, J. New York: Academic Press.

Final Project

For the Final Project, you will develop a proposal for an online instructional solution utilizing course tools. This will take the form of a 500-1000 word essay synthesizing readings, your learning experiences, and observed changes in your field. Drawing from at least four course sources, provide recommendations for how learning should evolve in your discipline by integrating ideas about online learning research, technologies, trends, and other relevant factors. This synthesis project allows you to consider the future of online learning for your professional roles. Submit the essay as a Word document.

Statement on Acceptable Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLM’s) (adapted from Texas Tech University and UMass Amherst)


While AI writing programs can be seen as a shortcut, their content can be problematic or bland. This semester, we'll explore AI as a potential tool, emphasizing ethical and responsible use. Misusing AI, such as submitting AI-generated work as your own, is academic misconduct and will be reported. Let’s see this class as a chance to learn and adapt with AI, not a platform for cheating. I look forward to exploring this new universe with you and learning from your insights on AI!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Climate Friendly Identity Development Course Outline

Design Document 🍃 Tech Tool Deliverable Link: Course Slides Target audience – who are the learners? Describe them in detail.   City community members ages 16+ who have an interest in developing an awareness or action-oriented approach to their climate friendly identity. This course would be offered through a public library; community college community enrichment program; or city recreational department. It could also be adapted to being enacted in a religious community, social activist/justice alliance group, NPOs with a mission aligned with climate action, senior centers, or any other community-minded organization. The contextual intention here is a course that adapts the learning objective to the human experience as folks are comfortable living it in the spaces they feel socially secure and affirmed. It seeks to meet learners who are looking to extend their participation and experiences in the world around them in relation to climate action awareness. A broad defini...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Review of Instructional Platforms: Coursera and Khan Academy

  VS The prompt this week is to review two instructional platforms from a suggested list (or select our own). I have chosen Coursera and Khan Academy for my review. These websites each have different goals, audiences, and methods of going about accomplishing those things. Below I will provide a brief blurb on each site pulled from their respective Wikipedia articles. I will give my initial impressions and a personal anecdote of experience with each. I will then rank each site in three categories;  1. ease of use for a person in my identity and with my skillset  2. what I feel are the top two strengths of each website through the instructional design lens at my current understanding level  3. a suggestion apiece for how I could see these sites used in a guided learning experience through the lens of the petal learning through topic exploration method I outlined in my podcast episode below. (I know, exhausting to site myself, but this is my blog and I'm curious if it h...
Post a Comment
Read more