Skip to main content

EXPECTATIONS: a new course carried on from the old.


Instructor: Dr. Brian Horvitz

The Theory and Practice of Online Learning, 2nd Edition, Anderson & Elloumi. Free
Ebook found at
 
Adding Some TEC-VARIETY: 100+ Activities for Motivating and Retaining Online
Learners, Free PDF download found at



Discussion Expectations:

1 page (approx: 500 words) by Thursdays, substantive responses to 2 peers by Sundays

Regarding your discussion postings, Grice's (1975) principle and maxims of conversation are also useful to keep in mind:

The principle of co-operation: Try to make your contribution one that supports the goal and purpose of the ongoing conversation.

1. Maxim of quantity: Make your contribution as informative as is required, but give no more information than is required. (Sometimes overly long posts make it harder to have conversational dialogue.)

2. Maxim of quality: Try to make your contribution one that is true. Do not say anything that you believe is false or lacks adequate evidence.

3. Maxim of relevance: Make your contribution relevant to the aims of the ongoing conversation. (Focus on the objectives and goals of that week's readings.)

4. Maxim of manner: Be clear. Try to avoid obscurity, ambiguity, wordiness. (Think of our discussions as conversations supported by evidence, but not as exercises in academic writing.)

From Grice, H. 1975. 'Logic and conversation'. In Speech Acts, edited by P. Cole, & Morgan, J. New York: Academic Press.

Final Project

For the Final Project, you will develop a proposal for an online instructional solution utilizing course tools. This will take the form of a 500-1000 word essay synthesizing readings, your learning experiences, and observed changes in your field. Drawing from at least four course sources, provide recommendations for how learning should evolve in your discipline by integrating ideas about online learning research, technologies, trends, and other relevant factors. This synthesis project allows you to consider the future of online learning for your professional roles. Submit the essay as a Word document.

Statement on Acceptable Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLM’s) (adapted from Texas Tech University and UMass Amherst)


While AI writing programs can be seen as a shortcut, their content can be problematic or bland. This semester, we'll explore AI as a potential tool, emphasizing ethical and responsible use. Misusing AI, such as submitting AI-generated work as your own, is academic misconduct and will be reported. Let’s see this class as a chance to learn and adapt with AI, not a platform for cheating. I look forward to exploring this new universe with you and learning from your insights on AI!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Internet Persona Level Unlocked

well now... I have recorded a podcast Likely Learning Episode 1 Here there be  dragons. ❤
Post a Comment
Read more

In Hypothetical Session: Developing a Climate Friendly Idn

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1GahSOk21o6RwwM0aAm0b_LSUlscXTjCrydiD7D_AJiQ/edit?usp=sharing  The course I am hypothetically developing is on Developing a Climate Friendly Identity. I prefer a mixture of both synchronous and asynchronous instruction. I think that both are necessary for a quality educational experiences. I also think, based on our readings, there is room to parse what is meant by sync/async a bit further. Because in our   Theory and Practice   textbook the distinction is based on time and place vs time and pace, whereas in the   Sync/Async Balancing Act   article (2007) the simpler definition that I am more familiar with seems to be the accepted term. The major difference being a course in which the teacher is engaged and running things vs the students are entirely in charge of the experience and there is no set time frame (not even a term/semester/school year). A course that you would sign up for through one of the learning platforms we ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Articulate a Microcourse for Something (I chose Teams)

via GIPHY   Welcome to Teams - a tiny primer Late Impressions: Using Articulate was something of an eye-opener to me. I have used a course builder software that developed from an open source product into one that is now profit based, and it is far clunkier than Articulate. I have also seen other people online who have created courses and felt wowed by their ability to design such stream-lined and visually pleasing experiences. Seeing that a lot of what I considered WOW factors are now WYSWG type building experiences in this product takes a lot of mystique out of how people are able to do that and the skills it actually takes, versus the ones I was making assumptions it took. With that, I felt a loss of personability within Articulate. It felt like I was being inducted into the Adobe brand over promoting the content I was creating my course for (admittedly still a large brand, lol). It was not hard to pattern a course after one of the templates, or to fall into the writing tone pro...
Post a Comment
Read more